Battlestar Galactica: 1978 Vs. 2003

The revival of Battlestar Galactica in 2003 is an attempt to deconstruct the canceled 1978 science fiction series.

The geniuses at ABC who cancelled the Battlestar series after only one season (I think most fans would not consider Galactica 1980 as anything but an attempt to scatter the throngs of followers of the original show) had no idea what a gaffe they made.

The network had the strongest primetime schedule of all the major studios that year. The television series was completely original and could have rocketed ABC into the stratosphere for a few years. Instead of foresight, the moguls decided that greed was a factor. The show was costing too much to produce despite the very high ratings. Consequently, they abruptly canceled it. They could have charged advertisers more money for commercial spots, but apparently that kind of obvious solution wasn’t part of their agenda.

It’s a shame that Glen Larson, the producer of the series, couldn’t convince the short sighted executives to think of the bigger picture over the long term. Dedicated viewers are much more valuable to advertisers who have targeted products to sell.

In their fervor to destroy a hugely popular science fiction series, ABC rearranged their primetime schedule. It resulted in an implosion from which to this day, they have never fully recovered.

Now, over two decades later, zealots realized that the passing years didn’t diminish the following for the original series. Hence, the latest attempt to deconstruct the mass following: BattleStar Galactica 2003.

Totally revamped to fit politically correct ways of thinking, the whole premise of the show has been altered. Cylons are no longer descended from an alien race. Instead, they were made by “man”. Lasers are replaced by bullets and nuclear missiles. Starbuck and Commander Cain are women instead of men. Sound effects are deadened, monotonous or non-existent. The theme music for the show is gone. Scripts are focused on everyday human foibles instead of imaginative offerings. Humor is replaced by stoic, stark naked dialogue. All the necessary elements for an interesting and entrancing series are eliminated in an attempt to unravel the implied morals behind the original series.

Acting oblivious to the masses of Battlestar fans, including Richard Hatch (one of the original actors who had attempted to resurrect the

series with scripts of his own that were ignored), the producers of the new series chose to follow their own politically correct views. I must admit that they have somewhat succeeded in driving wedges between original series fans and “new” followers. However, they will never realize their ultimate goal to obfuscate the message behind the story.

At some point in the future, perhaps a true Battlestar follower will obtain the rights to the series. Only then can the original epic continue. The 2003 drivel version can be explained away as a bizarre dream.

5
Liked it
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

8 Responses to “Battlestar Galactica: 1978 Vs. 2003”
  1. ClassicTVWatcher says:

    The new 2003 series sucks! It’s boring as hell and has a lame storyline. I hope someone brings back the action and excitement that was in the old 1970’s Galactica!

  2. firefox335 says:

    I was excited to hear about the revival of the series in the begining, util I heard that Starbuck would be played by Katee Sackhoff. I knew then that watching this politically correct piece of crap was out of the question. Perhaps they could reinvent Star Trek next. Make Kirk a black woman, Uhura a white man and cast Spock as a red-eyed tree frog with bipolar disorder.

  3. paul says:

    Well I stand as a lone voice that loves the new incarnation of BSG.

    As a kid I was a huge fan of the original series, but as an adult I find the new series much more entertaining.

  4. cobra sam says:

    Battlestar Galactica 1978

  5. duplissi says:

    Woah!! umm wow. the new bsg is my absolute favorite tv show, i love how it doesnt focus on scientific drivel and fantastic scenarios, but instead focuses on the trials that the crew and survivors go through. i cant believe that someone would consider the original supirior.

  6. Opinion BSG says:

    New BSG it’s too much of a departure from orginal story, Lt Starbuck a female…the series should have been called something new not BSG.

  7. new bsg goode says:

    heh i watched a clip of the original eugh it was incredibly cheesy ex “nuclear” missile explosions just looked like rpg explosions from duke nukem 3d, Pegasus “disappears” somehow from these “nuclear” explosions without a single trace, etc.

  8. I’m happy I discovered this blog page, I couldnt locate any information on this matter prior to. I also run a site and if you wish to ever interested in doing some guest writing for me please feel free to let me know, im always look for people to check out my blog site. Please stop by and leave a comment sometime!

Leave a Reply

comments powered by Disqus

<